Home
Articles
News
Backstory
Sortable Card List
Questions & Answers
Art Gallery
Events
Retailers
Forums
Create a Card
Agent Resources
Online Play (OCTGN)
Rulebook
Tournament Rules
Multiplayer Rules

 

EVE-CCG Forum  

home post reply threaded view help rules

Boardwalk :: Forum List Community Forums Rules and Questions

Blatherskite
User

Cruiser
Posts: 162
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 19:32 I realize this subject has been brought up, but I'm not looking for a debate here...in fact in looking for the answers to my questions I went through pages of crap trying to just get a little info...so if I sound pissy sorry. All the talk on this card and I still don't know what exactly was officially decided. Thanks in advance if you have the answers.

1.Does BTED allow you to put into play outer region only locations in your Home Region or vice versa (such as with sublet station)?

2.Does the card ability, such as Scordite, Omber, etc, come into effect when the card comes into play?

A quick question about Ginnungagap. What was the official ruling on playing from your hand a location into this outer region when nobody controls it?

Thanks again, and please don't hi-jack this for debate, there is already a thread dedicated to that on this topic. Just looking for official rulings/ clarification /errata.

Thanks again.
Blatherskite
Caldari Propagandist

A PRINCE ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline… - Machiavelli
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 514
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 19:44 1. No - even with the debate, this was universally accepted. Location-based restrictions are accepted to apply.

2. Yes - cards with "when it comes into play" effects still trigger, because the card is coming into play.

3. Not sure what the official word might be, but the rules are pretty clear that without an owner, as written, Ginnungagap's text wouldn't be active. Barring errata, there hasn't been anything to change that.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Blatherskite
User

Cruiser
Posts: 162
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 19:49 Thank you. Blatherskite
Caldari Propagandist

A PRINCE ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline… - Machiavelli
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Blatherskite
User

Cruiser
Posts: 162
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 19:53 oh... i forgot one.

If Sansha's Scout outpost is already in play and you BTED a location into the region with Sansha's does Sansha's go back to your hand?
Blatherskite
Caldari Propagandist

A PRINCE ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline… - Machiavelli
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 514
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 21:12 Nope. Sansha's says "is played" - BTED brings the card into play, but it is not "played".
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Snooby
User

Cruiser
Posts: 116
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 23:24 I still dont understand why there was a debate on BTED
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 514
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/10 23:43 Without starting the debate here: The new text for Decree says that the card must be "playable". That's an undefined term, and the debate over what that restriction meant got rather heated.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
DTee
User

Cruiser
Posts: 222
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/11 09:32 Buhallin wrote:

3. Not sure what the official word might be, but the rules are pretty clear that without an owner, as written, Ginnungagap's text wouldn't be active. Barring errata, there hasn't been anything to change that.


The intent on Ginnungagap is very clear (that you can't) and that's how Petur ruled it in Indy.

I agree that we need an official errata to tidy this one up but in the meantime I wouldn't stoop low enough to exploit the loophole (and if judging would smite anyone who did).

DTee

ps Nice summary guys. We've got a concise thread that covers all the important points.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 514
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/11 15:02 I feel very sorry for anyone who shows up to your event with a proper understanding of that rule, then Until WW gets around to the errata, it should be played according to the rule, not according to what a developer told you in a personal aside at a convention.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Blatherskite
User

Cruiser
Posts: 162
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Emperors decree - 2007/09/12 18:59 Zack, could we get an official ruling from someone official? Blatherskite
Caldari Propagandist

A PRINCE ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline… - Machiavelli
  The administrator has disabled public write access.

 

post reply

 

Boardwalk :: Forum List Community Forums Rules and Questions










Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

CARD LOOKUP

EVE-FOILED

EVE-CCG Germany

La Garde De L'Ouest FORUMS

BoardGameGeek.com



Website terms of service - About us - Contact
Copyright © CCP 1997-2007