Home
Articles
News
Backstory
Sortable Card List
Questions & Answers
Art Gallery
Events
Retailers
Forums
Create a Card
Agent Resources
Online Play (OCTGN)
Rulebook
Tournament Rules
Multiplayer Rules

 

EVE-CCG Forum  

home post reply threaded view help rules

Boardwalk :: Forum List Community Forums Rules and Questions

Moisews
User

Scout
Posts: 5
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/18 16:18 Last weekend I was playing with my friends and we got this situation:

Cormorant warping into an enemy controlled outer region vs a Kestrel with ambush command ability activated.

Q: Can the Kestrel choose not to apply the ambush effect, or is it mandatory?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
DTee
User

Cruiser
Posts: 222
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/18 17:06 The description of Ambush is on the card:
At the beginning of a withdraw step, choose a target attacking ship. This ship may deal 4 damage to the chosen target.)

You must choose an attacking ship but the word may means you don't have to deal damage to it.

So if a Verlator attacks your kestral you don't have to destroy it (which avoids the retaliate 2 killing the Kestral).

DTee
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 507
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/18 19:38 I feel like I'm missing something here...

Why wouldn't you want to Ambush the Cormorant?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Brootal
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 483
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/18 21:23 Buhallin wrote:
I feel like I'm missing something here...

Why wouldn't you want to Ambush the Cormorant?


While I agree you can choose not to apply damage, I don't see why you wouldn't want to in a Cormorant vs Kestrel. You can't withdraw, the best result (Baring unmentioned news cards) is likely to be mutual destruction, if you don't ambush, it's almost guaranteed he gains the region.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Buhallin
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 507
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/18 21:35 Exactly what I was thinking... Which makes me think either we're missing something, or the OP is
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
DTee
User

Cruiser
Posts: 222
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/19 10:20 I suspect Moisews is used to playing in a competitive environment and he's asking whether you have to remind your opponent about their ambush. The normal convention is that you don't have to remind your opponent about optional bilities like the dealing of damage within the ambush.

However, because the choose a ship is compulsory, you would have to remind your opponent about the ambush or risk a warning. Most of the Eve players I've met would remind their opponents of optional stuff too but it's less common in other CCG's.

DTee
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Moisews
User

Scout
Posts: 5
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/19 11:52 Thanks for the replies.

There's something wrong with my memory implants!

It's was not a Cormorant, it's a Catalyst. Sorry about the confusion. You see, as a Catalyst text says:

"When an enemy scout or frigate deals damage to catalyst, catalyst deals 2 damage to that ship."

If a Catalyst was ambushed by a Kestrel, the Kestrel would be destroyed immediately, that's why my competitive friends and I started a discution.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
DTee
User

Cruiser
Posts: 222
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/19 15:19 That makes more sense

It sounds like the smart play for the defending playing would be to choose not to deal any damage to the Catalyst and then withdraw.

I don't often get to say this, but it looks like CCP got the wording spot on. Your opponent is required to remind you about the ambush (if you forget) but you can't get shafted by having to apply the damage.

DTee
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Brootal
User

Battlecruiser
Posts: 483
graphgraph
 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Cormorant vs Ambush - 2008/02/19 21:11 That makes sense now
  The administrator has disabled public write access.

 

post reply

 

Boardwalk :: Forum List Community Forums Rules and Questions










Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

CARD LOOKUP

EVE-FOILED

EVE-CCG Germany

La Garde De L'Ouest FORUMS

BoardGameGeek.com



Website terms of service - About us - Contact
Copyright © CCP 1997-2007