Re:Hard Nuts - 2008/03/20 13:25Lol, that's the first time I've heard of disarmerement treaty (potentially) wrecking a constructed deck.
Amarr's defence against anti-ship news tends to be its counterspells (and to some extent Hired Enforcers). That does mean leaving Isk open for them but I don't think that's the deck's biggest problem.
Entity introduced this as a fun deck and I suspect there are plenty of players out there who would enjoy playing it. Personally I don't like relying on Concord SWATs, they are seeing so much constructed play that most decks are running a way to deal with them (e.g. Chief Watchman or Direct Damage).
DTee
The administrator has disabled public write access.
